Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of films featuring the destruction of art and cultural heritage
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 22:51, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- List of films featuring the destruction of art and cultural heritage (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Yet another indiscriminate, unsourced list of works of fiction or fictional things that fails WP:LISTN. Deprodder cited the equivalent real-world list List of destroyed heritage, but that does not address the concerns about WP:IPC. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 21:15, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film, Popular culture, and Lists. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 21:15, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Apparently art and cultural heritage means buildings/landmarks. This is a bit of a stretch... Monuments Men I was thinking, not Mothra destroying Tokyo. Oaktree b (talk) 23:04, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:NLIST and for the criteria being too vague and broad. Clarityfiend (talk) 12:12, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- This was compiled by several professional art conservators, including myself and (@Pinknantucket. If tightening up the criteria means it won't be deleted, that's a workable solution. 2600:8800:1605:9B00:FDCF:EED3:A88:D33A (talk) 16:53, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
- Dear anon (I cannot even ping you as you did not sign with an account...). Please read up on WP:OR and WP:NLIST. Perhaps this could be userfied as personal space trivia, but right now this is not a type of material that belongs on Wikipedia. See also WP:NOTTVTROPES. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:19, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
- This was compiled by several professional art conservators, including myself and (@Pinknantucket. If tightening up the criteria means it won't be deleted, that's a workable solution. 2600:8800:1605:9B00:FDCF:EED3:A88:D33A (talk) 16:53, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. Ridcolously too broad and completely unreferenced. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:18, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.